<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, THIS is why conservatives should love evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thinkevolution.net/archives/31/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thinkevolution.net/archives/31</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:16:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: thinkevolution.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Darwinism, left or right&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://thinkevolution.net/archives/31#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>thinkevolution.net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Darwinism, left or right&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 18:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thinkevolution.net/?p=31#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Yikes. (Interesting: a similar argument for evolutionary conservatism by David Brooks and an observation by Michael Shermer about liberal-vs-conservative attitudes towards the biology of sexual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yikes. (Interesting: a similar argument for evolutionary conservatism by David Brooks and an observation by Michael Shermer about liberal-vs-conservative attitudes towards the biology of sexual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

