http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39 Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:06:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-5 A Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:16:23 +0000 http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-5 This is a great review of the article. Much more nuanced than mine! This is a great review of the article. Much more nuanced than mine!

]]> http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-34 thinkevolution.net » Blog Archive » Nothing in evolution makes sense except in the light of population genetics Wed, 23 May 2007 01:54:14 +0000 http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-34 [...] “why?” question of interest. Why did we survive while the Neanderthals went extinct? Because we had a special beneficial mutation. Why isn’t hemochromatosis more rare? Because our hemochromatosis-prone ancestors survived [...] […] “why?” question of interest. Why did we survive while the Neanderthals went extinct? Because we had a special beneficial mutation. Why isn’t hemochromatosis more rare? Because our hemochromatosis-prone ancestors survived […]

]]> http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-717 thinkevolution.net » Blog Archive » Another naughty example by the NYTimes Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:53:37 +0000 http://thinkevolution.net/archives/39#comment-717 [...] it’s so full of flimsy logic. Of course it’s just the latest article among many (e.g. 1,2,3) that have inappropriately invoked adaptive explanations for complex human [...] […] it’s so full of flimsy logic. Of course it’s just the latest article among many (e.g. 1,2,3) that have inappropriately invoked adaptive explanations for complex human […]

]]>