We’ll all be much better off when evolutionary psychology goes the way of phrenology. And I understand the impulse to treat nature as morally neutral, but isn’t that very neutrality grounds for settling some kinds of policy disputes? I mean, aren’t there specific policies having to do with, say, wetlands maintenance, zoning, or endangered species that depend on judgments about nature? I don’t think it’s a good idea, in principle, to exclude evolutionary science from public policy judgments.